1983: Industrial Policy in American States: The Invisible Side of the Debate

Dubnick, Mel. “Industrial Policy in American States: The Invisible Side of the Debate.” Prepared for presentation at the 1983 Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, November 3–5, Birmingham.

AI-Generated Summary:

The document explores the scope, strategies, and limitations of state-level industrial policies in the United States, emphasizing their strategic leverage points and implications.

The Role of State Industrial Policies

  • All fifty states have some form of industrial policy aimed at attracting, retaining, and expanding industries.
  • The debate centers on whether the U.S. needs a national industrial policy rather than focusing solely on state efforts.
  • State policies are often overlooked in national discussions but are crucial in regional economic development.

Framework of Industrial Policy Leverage Points

  • Governments can influence industrial development through six key leverage points: market climate, size, structure, resources, risks, and behavior.
  • These leverage points represent vulnerabilities that policies can target to shape business decisions.
  • Policy tools include moral suasion, regulation, public ownership, and indirect measures like tax credits.

Market Climate and Its Influence

  • Business climate is subjective and depends on attitudes of populations and officials toward industry.
  • States promote their business climates through media campaigns and incentives to attract firms.
  • The effectiveness of such campaigns is debated, but many states believe a favorable climate influences location decisions.

Market Size and State Capabilities

  • Market size is a critical factor for firms seeking growth or stability.
  • States have limited control over market size due to federal preemptions and interstate commerce restrictions.
  • States can support industries in expanding markets through lobbying and trade promotion efforts.

Market Resources and Incentive Programs

  • Land, labor, and capital are essential resources that states can manipulate via subsidies, tax exemptions, and financial assistance.
  • Programs like low-interest loans, tax credits, and resource-based incentives have expanded significantly since 1966.
  • Resource-based strategies are the most commonly used form of industrial policy at the state level.

Market Structure and Competition

  • The level of competition within markets influences business decisions.
  • States can influence market structure through regulation, antitrust exemptions, and support for monopolies or industry associations.
  • Limitations exist due to federal laws and the nature of interstate commerce.

Regulatory Tools and Behavioral Norms

  • Deregulation and lax enforcement are used to attract industries, especially in less regulated sectors.
  • States may deregulate or relax enforcement to create a more favorable business environment.
  • Regulatory strategies are limited by political and social conditions and may be temporary.

Market Risks and Liabilities

  • States can reduce business risks through loan guarantees and liability protections.
  • Federal policies like patent laws and indemnity acts also influence business risk management.
  • State efforts in risk mitigation are less common but can be effective in specific industries.

Influence of Business Behavior and Norms

  • Direct regulation of business behavior has declined, but deregulation can be a strategic tool.
  • States often participate in regulatory “race to the bottom” to attract industries.
  • The effectiveness of behavioral regulation depends on political, economic, and social contexts.

Conclusions and Future Directions

  • State policies primarily rely on resource-based strategies, with potential for diversification.
  • The effectiveness of these policies varies and is influenced by federal constraints and regional factors.
  • The debate on national versus state industrial policies must consider the existing state-level activities and their implications.

Author’s Note: This conference paper preceded the published article: Dubnick, Mel, and Lynne Holt. “Industrial Policy and the States.” Publius 15 (1), 1985: 113–29.

Scroll to Top