1998/2000: Accountability

Romzek, Barabara S. and Melvin J. Dubnick, “Accountability.” In THE INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, edited by Jay M. Shafritz (Westview Press, 1998), volume 1, pp. 6-11. Reprinted in DEFINING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: SELECTIONS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION , edited by Jay M. Shafritz, (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000), pp. 382-395.

AI-Generated Summary:

Concept and Importance of Accountability

  • Accountability involves holding individuals or agencies answerable for their performance.
  • It is a fundamental social relationship across various contexts, including public sector governance.
  • Accountability influences the daily operations of government and democratic administration.
  • Mechanisms for accountability include delegation, verification, responsiveness, blame assessment, and responsibility allocation.

Historical and Functional Aspects of Accountability

  • Accountability originated from the need to delegate tasks in governance.
  • It involves establishing expectations, overseeing performance, and maintaining responsiveness.
  • Verification methods include record-keeping and audits, especially for public finances.
  • Responsiveness ensures officials act in accordance with expectations and remain answerable to rulers.

Cultural and Social Dimensions of Blame

  • Accountability is influenced by cultural settings, affecting blame attribution.
  • Four cultural types range from formal answerability to scapegoating.
  • Formal answerability requires a causal link between actions and outcomes.
  • Blame can be assigned even without empirical blameworthiness, leading to scapegoating or political scapegoating.

Challenges of Multiple Accountability Systems

  • Modern governments involve dispersed authority among many officials and agencies.
  • Multiple accountability systems create conflicts and complicate performance assessment.
  • Agencies face the problem of many masters, with diverse and sometimes conflicting expectations.
  • Managing multiple accountability demands strategic, adaptive, reactive, or passive responses.

Managing Under Accountability Dilemmas

  • Public managers adopt different roles: passivity, reaction, adaptation, or strategic influence.
  • Effective management involves shaping expectations and influencing accountability relationships.
  • The complexity of accountability systems requires ongoing adaptation and strategic planning.
  • The core challenge remains ensuring public officials pursue valued goals amid diverse expectations.
Scroll to Top