Bearfield, Domonic and Melvin Dubnick, “Sowing and Reaping at the Big Dig: The Legacies of Neomanagerialism,” ADMINISTRATIVE THEORY & PRAXIS, 29:1 (March, 2007):132-139.
AI-Generated Summary:
The document discusses the Big Dig project in Boston, its management philosophies, key figures involved, and the impact of neomanagerialism on public infrastructure.
Overview of the Big Dig Project and Its Historical Context
- The Big Dig was a massive public works project aimed at transforming Boston’s transportation infrastructure.
- It faced delays, cost overruns, and engineering challenges over its three-decade span.
- The project became a symbol of managerial and political issues in large-scale public projects.
Neomanagerialism and Public Sector Management
- Neomanagerialism emphasizes marketization, privatization, and reduced oversight in government projects.
- Larry Terry’s analysis links this philosophy to the management of the Big Dig.
- The shift in management practices contributed to cost increases and safety concerns.
Key Figures in Big Dig Planning and Construction
- Frederick Salvucci promoted traditional oversight with a long-term view.
- James Kerasiotes adopted a neomanagerial approach focused on accountability and market-driven oversight.
- Their differing philosophies influenced project outcomes and oversight quality.
Management Approaches and Their Consequences
- Salvucci’s approach prioritized consensus but led to delays and higher costs.
- Kerasiotes’ approach aimed for efficiency but resulted in lax oversight and safety issues.
- The conflict between these approaches exemplifies the impact of management philosophy on project success.
Overlapping Historical Arcs and Broader Implications
- The Big Dig’s history parallels shifts in public management practices from traditional to neomanagerial models.
- The project illustrates how managerial philosophies influence infrastructure quality and safety.
- Thinning of administrative capacities under neomanagerialism risks future safety and effectiveness.
Larry Terry’s Legacy and Lessons for Public Administration
- Terry’s work critiques neomanagerialism and emphasizes the importance of strong administrative institutions.
- His insights highlight the need for corrective actions to strengthen government capacity.
- The document advocates applying Terry’s lessons to prevent future infrastructure failures.