1996: Farewell from the Catbird Seat (editorial)

Rosenbloom, David H. and Melvin J. Dubnick, “Farewell from the Catbird Seat (editorial)” with D. H. Rosenbloom, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 55, no. 6 (November/December, 1996): 503-505.

AI-Generated Summary:

The document reflects on the end of a 11-year editorial partnership, discussing the state of public administration research, practice, and reform efforts.

Editorial Reflection and Acknowledgments

  • The authors thank institutions, colleagues, and organizations that supported their editorial work over 11 years.
  • They received recognition, including the Thomas Dye Award, for their contributions to public administration scholarship.
  • The partnership began with the Policy Studies Journal and continued at PAR since 1991.

State of Knowledge Production in Public Administration

  • Public administration research is healthy, with about 230 manuscripts reviewed annually.
  • There is a strong, growing knowledge base, mostly about what does not work.
  • Many compendia of knowledge, like Handbooks and Encyclopedias, are now available.

Practice and Reform in Public Administration

  • Much research is underutilized but still influences practice, especially through reform efforts like Reinventing Government.
  • Practice reform often applies existing research rather than creating new solutions.
  • Some authors lack practical experience, leading to unrealistic or superficial proposals.

Focus on Values and Human Nature

  • Core issues involve underlying values, which are often in conflict, affecting reform proposals.
  • Different views of human nature influence reform approaches, from Hobbesian to Rousseauian perspectives.
  • Recognizing these perspectives is essential for meaningful reform.

Historical and Legal Foundations

  • Many manuscripts lack historical context, risking a loss of understanding of administrative development.
  • Law is often misunderstood or ignored, despite its central role in administrative practice.
  • Legal frameworks like Administrative Procedure Acts are crucial for regulation and transparency.

Methodology and Reform Prescriptions

  • The field is improving in methodological rigor, especially in statistical techniques.
  • Case studies are improving but remain somewhat suspect.
  • Reform proposals sometimes lack logical connection to identified problems and diagnoses.

Political Aspects of Reform

  • Some manuscripts exaggerate faults of the status quo to push reform, leading to bureaucratic bashing.
  • This tendency can undermine responsible public administration and foster blame cultures.
  • Maintaining integrity and professionalism is vital amid political pressures.

International and Comparative Public Administration

  • American public administration is influential worldwide, used in many democracies and nondemocracies.
  • Lessons from other countries are valuable, but large-scale reforms must consider contextual differences.
  • Globalization encourages cross-national learning, though caution is necessary.

Overall Outlook and Final Remarks

  • The field shows strong development and engagement, with a focus on practice, values, history, and methodology.
  • The authors look forward to future research without editorial influence.

Scroll to Top