2003: Nurturing Civic Lives: Developmental Perspectives on Civic Education — Introduction

Dubnick, Melvin J., “Nurturing Civic Lives: Developmental Perspectives on Civic Education — Introduction,” PS: POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 36, no. 2 (April, 2003): 253-255.

AI-Generated Summary:

This document explores the historical and theoretical debates surrounding civic education, emphasizing developmental and traditionalist perspectives on fostering youth civic engagement.

Historical Foundations of Civic Education

  • Traditionalist approach rooted in moral education, emphasizing shared values, patriotism, and loyalty.
  • Civic education historically linked to religious and patriotic rituals, textbooks, and moral character development.
  • Emphasized inculcating affection and moral virtues over cognitive political knowledge.
  • Opposed to developmentalist views, which saw children as naturally predisposed to moral goodness.

Developmentalist Perspective

  • Inspired by Rousseau, Piaget, and Dewey, viewing children as inherently moral and capable of thinking independently.
  • Advocates for education that nurtures natural moral and civic predispositions rather than indoctrination.
  • Dewey emphasized schools as places to teach children how to think, not what to think.
  • Led to decline of explicit civics courses in favor of indirect civic experiences and character education.

Challenges and Shifts in Civic Education

  • Empirical studies questioned the effectiveness of formal civics instruction.
  • Rising concern about the decline of social capital and civic participation, exemplified by Robert Putnam’s “Bowling Alone.”
  • The youth civic development approach emerged as a response, focusing on fostering civic dispositions early in life.
  • Influenced by Kohlberg’s moral development theory, viewing children as moral philosophers and good citizens.

Recent Research and Initiatives

  • Cross-national studies track youth civic engagement and development.
  • Emphasis on community service and civic experiences as predictors of future participation.
  • Strategies designed to promote civic engagement among marginalized youth, considering developmental stages.
  • Ongoing debates about the normative assumptions underlying developmentalist models and their connection to human nature.

Current Trends and Future Directions

  • Increased interdisciplinary research linking psychology and political science.
  • Calls for more empirical validation of developmentalist assumptions.
  • Recognition of internal critiques within developmentalist circles.
  • The symposium aims to stimulate further research and practical applications in youth civic learning.
Scroll to Top